Saturday, April 18, 2020

Literary Essay Writing And The Use Of A Sample Literary Essay Rubric

Literary Essay Writing And The Use Of A Sample Literary Essay RubricThe use of a sample literary essay rubric is useful when it comes to creating an essay that will stand out among the competition. This is not only true in an essay competition, but also when one needs to write a research paper or even a thesis.When it comes to a research paper, a sample rubric will be helpful in identifying the common types of writing that are used in scientific research papers. For example, one will notice that scientific paper samples tend to incorporate the use of numbered lists and/or subheadings. By simply observing this writing style, one can determine which types of sentences are expected to be used in a scientific paper.In order to make an essay writeable and easy to read, a literary essay rubric should contain some type of vocabulary chart. A vocabulary chart can be included in the sample rubric to make sure that the student has a firm grasp on the types of words that are typically used in s cientific writing. It is also important to note that when reading scientific writing, it is very important to follow the writer's writing style. This is why one should always use their knowledge of the writer's writing style to determine if they should read the writer's work or not.One more important thing to consider when using a literary essay rubric for a research paper or thesis is that when one uses the sample rubric, they should always be consistent with the information provided in the rubric. It is also possible that one can use a template that is specifically tailored to the kind of paper they will be submitting. For example, a PhD thesis will likely contain different types of writing than a research paper, so they may find that they need to use a different kind of writing style than a research paper.With regards to using a literary essay rubric, it is important to note that the process of creating a literary essay rubric will take some time. This is because there are many d ifferent types of essay writing, and each individual type is not always easy to identify.However, one thing that all writers must understand is that in order to create a good essay, they must spend time working on their own writing style. This means that if a writer wants to be successful in terms of writing, they must learn to develop their own writing style. It is important for writers to understand this as they look for a literary essay rubric.A writer must also become familiar with the writing style of others before trying to determine what type of writing they will be expected to do. This is because if a writer tries to create their own style, they may actually be creating a style that is different from that of others. Therefore, a writer should always observe the style of other writers to find out how they work, or how they should write their essays.After they have developed their own style, writers can then choose to use a sample literary essay rubric as a tool to develop the ir own writing style. It is important for writers to remember that, in order to be successful at writing, they must spend time developing their own style, which will eventually lead to a successful writing career.

Monday, April 13, 2020

Napster.Com Essays - Metallica, Napster, Web 2.0,

Napster.Com Napster.com The Napster software (http://www.napster.com), launched early in 1999, allows internet users to share and download MP3 files directly from any computer connected to the Napster network. The software is used by downloading a client program from the Napster site and then connecting to the network through this software, which allows sharing (uploading and downloading) of MP3 files between all users connected to the network. While Napster does not condone copyright infringement, there is no opportunity in the software to stop this, or for royalties to be paid to artists whose songs are being duplicated for free. Unlike similar file-sharing applications (Gnutella, Freenet), Napster limits users to uploading/downloading of MP3 files only. These files are compressed wave (.wav) files. The advantage of MP3 files is that they are approximately one-tenth the size of the corresponding .wav file and can be close-to-CD-quality. It is for this reason that many artists, record labels and other music industry stakeholders are concerned by the MP3 file format and applications like Napster that simplify the sharing of copyrighted material. Other file formats in common use on the Internet are not as threatening to the recording industry; primarily due to the reduced quality of the recording. Real audio (.ra, .rm) files have reduced sound quality (comparable to radio) and are usually streamed over a different protocol, allowing people to listen to songs without having (or being able) to download the source files. Another 'music' file format common on the internet is the midi format. These files are of no threat to the music industry because the files are not actually a recording of the music; rather a set of instructions to the computer as to what sounds to play (and there is no way to duplicate vocal tracks). This file format is also becoming outdated and being used less and less. The reaction from recording artists, record labels and other music industry players has been varied, but primarily anti-Napster. The first action to be taken against Napster was by the band Metallica. In April of this year, they sued Napster Inc for copyright infringement. The case was settled out of court when Napster agreed to ban some 300,000 users who had allegedly downloaded Metallica songs. Again in June Napster Inc was sued for copyright infringement by The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), a trade group representing the US recording industry, alleging Napster is enabling and encouraging the illegal copying and distribution of copyrighted music. Napster claims that Audio Home Recording Act that permits copying of material for personal use, allows it's uses to swap MP3s. Napster further claims immunity by defining the company as an ISP under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The RIAA unsuccessfully applied to have an injunction to stop Napster's operations u ntil after the court case in September, so Napster will continue to operate until (and if) the court rules against Napster. Other artists and record labels (http://www.napster.com/speakout/artists.html and http://www.napster.com/speakout/labels.html) have responded to the advent of Napster and similar applications in a more positive way, embracing the new technology rather than rejecting it. On their website, the Offspring says MP3 technology and programs such as Napster [are] a vital and necessary means to promote music and foster better relationships with our fans. Interestingly enough, the Offspring's last album, Americana, was made available online illegally before commercially released, yet it is the band's best-selling album to date. Furthermore, a number of surveys have proven that Napster users actually buy more CDs, after 'sampling' the songs online (http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/12093.html). It is this issue that is at the core of the RIAA lawsuit, whether Napster and similar applications will mean reduced CD sales. Napster does challenge the traditional distribution of music (CDs, cass ettes, vinyl etc) but whether this should be viewed as a threat or simply a new medium to be exploited by the music industry is another issue. Some record labels, most notably Epitaph (http://www.epitaph.com) have partnered with sites like e-music.com to sell full albums and single songs in MP3 format over the web. In this case, the record company has in fact gained a new distribution method, rather than seeing it as the 'enemy'. Of course, in this scenario, the record company still gets a cut